gcc-arm-none-eabi performance with redundant instructions

hi all,
I try to use gcc-arm-none-eabi but find that it always gets redundant instructions compared to other compilers like armcc or aarch64-linux-android-gcc. And the average size compiled with gcc-arm-none-eabi 4.9 is more than double that compiled with other compilers.
For instance, the following c code:

typedef struct list_data_s {
 signed short data16;
 signed short idx;
} list_data;

void copy_info(list_data *to,list_data *from) {
    to->data16=from->data16;
    to->idx=from->idx;
}
 is dis-assembly with gcc-arm-none-eabi as:
00000db8 <copy_info>:
     db8: b480 push {r7}
     dba: b083 sub sp, #12
     dbc: af00 add r7, sp, #0
     dbe: 6078 str r0, [r7, #4]
     dc0: 6039 str r1, [r7, #0]
     dc2: 683b ldr r3, [r7, #0]
     dc4: 881a ldrh r2, [r3, #0]
     dc6: 687b ldr r3, [r7, #4]
     dc8: 801a strh r2, [r3, #0]
     dca: 683b ldr r3, [r7, #0]
     dcc: 885a ldrh r2, [r3, #2]
     dce: 687b ldr r3, [r7, #4]
     dd0: 805a strh r2, [r3, #2]
     dd2: 370c adds r7, #12
     dd4: 46bd mov sp, r7
     dd6: f85d 7b04 ldr.w r7, [sp], #4
     dda: 4770 bx lr

while complied with armcc as:
    copy_info
        0x000002d4: 880a .. LDRH r2,[r1,#0]
        0x000002d6: 8002 .. STRH r2,[r0,#0]
        0x000002d8: 8849 I. LDRH r1,[r1,#2]
        0x000002da: 8041 A. STRH r1,[r0,#2]
        0x000002dc: 4770 pG BX lr

and compiled with aarch64-linux-android-gcc as:
00000000 <copy_info>:
   0: e1d120b0 ldrh r2, [r1]
   4: e1d130b2 ldrh r3, [r1, #2]
   8: e52db004 push {fp} ; (str fp, [sp, #-4]!)
   c: e28db000 add fp, sp, #0
  10: e1c020b0 strh r2, [r0]
  14: e1c030b2 strh r3, [r0, #2]
  18: e24bd000 sub sp, fp, #0
  1c: e49db004 pop {fp} ; (ldr fp, [sp], #4)
  20: e12fff1e bx lr

I use compile option like:-g -flto -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-inline --specs=nano.specs --specs=nosys.specs -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3,
I don't know whether i use the non-reasonable compile options or anything wrong with this compiler,does anyone give suggestion about this?